As Congress considers reforms to private health insurance, we urge you to ensure that coverage provides meaningful access to the medications, services, and care patients need and protects them from practices that shift costs or create unnecessary barriers to treatment.
Complaint letter to OPM on BCBSA federal employee plan PrEP coverage
We are writing to urge you to require Blue Cross Blue Shield Federal Employee Plan (FEP), the largest carrier in the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program, to fully cover long-acting injectable PrEP products. We are most concerned that BCBS is charging cost-sharing for Yeztugo (lenacapavir), violating OPM’s requirement that carriers cover all FDA-approved PrEP drugs without cost-sharing.
Comments urging the Pharmacy Quality Alliance to develop a new PrEP adherence measure
We submitted comments to Pharmacy Quality Alliance supporting a timely replacement of the ARV treatment adherence measure and urging a new PrEP adherence measure, with both measures designed to account for #insurer-imposed disruptions in HIV care.
Letter asking Gov. Newsom to sign CA SB1023 to expand access to all forms of PrEP
We strongly believe that access to all forms of PrEP is essential to ending HIV in California. Nearly 5,000 Californians are diagnosed with HIV each year, and persistent disparities underscore the need to ensure access to the full range of HIV prevention options. Patients should be able to choose the PrEP option that works best for them without unnecessary insurance or administrative barriers. For these reasons, we respectfully urge you to sign Senate Bill 1023 into law.
Comments to Sen. Cassidy on 340B Drug Pricing Integrity and Affordability for Patients Act discussion draft
We submitted comments on the 340B for Patients Act discussion draft, supporting legislative efforts to put the 340B Program on a firm statutory basis so that it can continue to serve people affected by HIV and other serious conditions far into the future. We urge Congress to protect HIV, STD, and other safety-net providers as well as ADAPs, and oppose provisions that would restrict subgrantee eligibility for STD clinics. We support an updated patient definition that does not restrict telemedicine or rapid start interventions. We also strongly support new transparency, reporting, and affordability requirements for hospitals, which account for the vast majority of 340B spending and growth but face no requirements to demonstrate patient benefit.