Testimony, Comments, & Letters

;

Public Comments on Potential Viral Hepatitis Quality Measures in Medicaid

Jun 7, 2024

We support the adoption of quality measures for hepatitis B and hepatitis C in Medicaid. We support the adoption of hepatitis C screening and treatment initiation measures within state Medicaid programs. We urge HHS to consider quality measures for hepatitis B screening and linkage to care, as well as for hepatitis C sustained virological response (SVR) for testing and proposal to the Medicaid Adult Core Set. We support the implementation of hepatitis B screening, hepatitis C screening, and hepatitis C treatment initiation quality measures within state Medicaid programs.

read more

Senate testimony on FY25 appropriations for HIV and hepatitis programs

May 24, 2024

Our nation can eliminate both HIV and viral hepatitis, but without investing additional resources to accelerate our efforts, we will continue to fall short of these ambitious goals. Increased investment–and certainly not cuts–in surveillance, education, prevention, and care and treatment will lead to further progress in reducing HIV and viral hepatitis, which include taking a syndemic approach to achieve maximum impact.

read more

Comments to MD Prescription Drug Affordability Board on HIV treatments

May 15, 2024

While we are supportive of the Maryland Prescription Drug Affordability Board (PDAB) goal of improving treatment affordability, we urge PDAB members and staff to address concerns surrounding access to provider-recommended HIV treatments at the individual level and the impact on broader public health goals and provide clarity around the affordability review process to enable meaningful community input.

read more

Concerns with Rhode Island Drug Cost Review Commission (S 2719)

May 14, 2024

Given the important nature of prescription drugs to the life-saving treatment of HIV and hepatitis B, and now the cure of hepatitis C and the prevention of HIV, we have long advocated for affordable access to prescription medications. We applaud your commitment to ensuring that beneficiaries can access and afford the prescription medications that their providers prescribe. While we support and share the committee’s intent to lower out-of-pocket costs for consumers, we believe the proposed Rhode Island Drug Cost Review Commission (S 2719) would neither benefit patients in the long run nor result in reducing patients’ costs.

read more

Concerns with Rhode Island Drug Cost Review Commission (H 8220)

May 8, 2024

We believe policymakers should focus on those issues that directly impact patients, such as PBM regulation and reform, standard plan designs with reasonable deductibles and nominal copays, and ensuring copay assistance counts. For example, Rhode Island still allows issuers to implement harmful copay accumulator adjustment policies that permit double-dipping by payers to take copay assistance without crediting beneficiary out-of-pocket costs.

read more

Search

Categories

Tags

ACA Appropriations Biden administration CDC co-pay accumulators Congress copay copay accumulator Copay accumulators Copay assistance Cost-sharing COVID-19 Drug Pricing FDA Gay men healthcare Hepatitis Hepatitis B hepatitis C Hepatitis Prevention HHS HIV HIV Prevention Insurers Medicaid medicare Medicare Part D NAIC NIH PBM PBMs PrEP Prescription Drugs Private Insurance Ryan White Program state STDs Syringe services Testing transparency Treatment Trump administration women

Recent Testimony, Letters, Comments

Pin It on Pinterest